 |
|
According
to Mr. Blumenthal, gun manufacturer Smith and Wesson has taken a lot of
heat from other manufacturers of firearms because it agreed to work with
the government and produce guns with internal trigger locks, traceable bullets,
and to develop a smart gun that is usable by the owner only. Outraged criticisms
and boycotts from other major manufacturers as well as gun distributors,
and immense political pressure from the NRA, has forced Smith and Wesson
to reconsider its stand. Why would those other companies take such a rigid
attitude towards gun control? "The NRA feels that any mandatory provision
is a step toward taking guns away or towards creating a national licensing
system," Mr. Blumenthal explained.
Mr. Delfay countered that gun manufacturers and distributors were disappointed
with Smith and Wesson's move to cooperate with the government for three
primary reasons. Ninety perent of the handguns manufactured in the United
States are made with trigger locks. In fact, Sterm and Ruger has been making
guns with trigger locks for the last 10 years. Secondly, the gun manufacturers
were angered by the media's representation of Smith and Wesson as the only
company that was interested in gun safety. Lastly, Mr. Delfay told me that
Smith and Wesson infuriated other gun manufacturers because "they made
rules and regulations for retailers and distributors that they had no authority
to implement."
Mr. Delfay also told me that approximately 1,000 people a year die accidentally
from the irresponsible handling of firearms, and that the primary problem
does not lie with the accidental offenders, but rather with the criminals.
Arguing that the U.S. should enforce current laws before creating new legislation,
he said that there are many systems in place to catch these offenders, however,
the laws are not implemented. The National Instant Criminal System (a system
that does background checks on gun consumers) detected 180,000 criminals
attempting to buy firearms last year, however, only 11 were prosecuted!
Mr. Blumenthal contended that this more vigorous enforcement should be done
simultaneously with the passage of new legislation. Even with the existing
legislation, he believes that vicious acts of violence and deadly mistakes
are still too possible. Gun manufacturers need to assume some of the responsibility.
The responsibility lies with the owner according to Mr. Delfay, who made
the comparison of someone dying as a result of a drunk driver getting behind
the wheel of an automobile. "You wouldn't sue the car manufacturer,"
he stated. "The problem shouldn't be with the product or with the responsible
user, but with the criminal who uses the product," he contended. |
|
 |
|
|
|